Opinions
Sometimes the best way to take the pulse of a community is to just go ahead and ask. From your opinion about CSS's rate of change, to more thorny questions like whether CSS should be considered a programming language, you finally had a chance to tell us exactly what's on your mind!
For each of the following statements, we asked you how much you agreed on a 5-point scale.
Learning Curve
Completion Percentage: 98.56% (11154)
Completion Percentage: 98.56% (11154)
Percents%CountΣ
“CSS is easy to learn”
Rate of Change
Completion Percentage: 98.93% (11196)
Completion Percentage: 98.93% (11196)
Percents%CountΣ
“CSS is evolving too slowly”
Non-Semantic Classes
Completion Percentage: 98.52% (11150)
Completion Percentage: 98.52% (11150)
Percents%CountΣ
“Non-semantic classes such as .center, .large-text, etc. should be avoided.”
Selector Nesting
Completion Percentage: 98.6% (11159)
Completion Percentage: 98.6% (11159)
Percents%CountΣ
“Selector nesting such as .foo .bar ul li {...} should be avoided.”
Programming Language
Completion Percentage: 98.68% (11168)
Completion Percentage: 98.68% (11168)
Percents%CountΣ
“CSS is a programming language”
Enjoyment
Completion Percentage: 98.97% (11201)
Completion Percentage: 98.97% (11201)
Percents%CountΣ
“I enjoy writing CSS”
Missing Features
Completion Percentage: 30.72% (3477)
Completion Percentage: 30.72% (3477)
Percents%CountΣ
What do developers feel is currently missing from CSS?